MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.018

Медицинская библиотека · European urology oncology · 2025

Patient-reported Outcomes in KEYLYNK-010: Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Participants with Biomarker-unselected, Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Mehra Niven, Antonarakis Emmanuel S, Park Se Hoon, Goh Jeffrey C, McDermott Ray, Sala Gonzalez Nuria, Fong Peter C, Greil Richard, De Santis Maria, Yanez Patricio Eduardo, Huang Yi-Hsiu, Begbie Stephen D, Rey Felipe, Kramer Gero, Suzuki Hiroyoshi, Saretsky Todd L, Ghate Sameer R, Cui Yi, Hosius Christian, Yu Evan Y

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not significantly improve radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival versus a next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 3 KEYLYNK-010 trial. We present prespecified patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYLYNK-010.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab plus olaparib or an NHA (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide). PROs were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Cancer (FACT-P), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. The PRO endpoints included time to pain progression (TTPP) as per BPI-SF and the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 15 in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) scores.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The PRO analysis population included 774 participants (pembrolizumab plus olaparib, n = 520; NHA, n = 254). The median follow-up was 18.7 (range, 6.1-31.7) mo. No meaningful differences were observed in TTPP for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA (median: 13.5 vs 12.0 mo; hazard ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.26). From baseline to week 15, no meaningful LSM differences were observed between the treatment groups in FACT-P total, BPI-SF, and EQ-5D VAS scores. Limitations include no formal hypothesis testing.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: No meaningful differences were observed in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or disease-related symptom scores for pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA in participants with biomarker-unselected, pretreated mCRPC. These findings suggest that pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not negatively impact HRQoL in participants with pretreated mCRPC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT03834519.

Для цитирования: Mehra Niven, Antonarakis Emmanuel S, Park Se Hoon, Goh Jeffrey C, McDermott Ray, Sala Gonzalez Nuria, Fong Peter C, Greil Richard, De Santis Maria, Yanez Patricio Eduardo, Huang Yi-Hsiu, Begbie Stephen D, Rey Felipe, Kramer Gero, Suzuki Hiroyoshi, Saretsky Todd L, Ghate Sameer R, Cui Yi, Hosius Christian, Yu Evan Y. Patient-reported Outcomes in KEYLYNK-010: Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Participants with Biomarker-unselected, Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.. European urology oncology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.