MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archneurol.2011.85

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of neurology · 2011

In-flight seizures and fatal air embolism: the importance of a chest radiograph.

Arnaiz Javier, Marco de Lucas Enrique, Piedra Tatiana, Arnaiz Garcia Maria Elena, Patel Ashesh D, Gutierrez Agustin

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe for the first time, to our knowledge, a case of recurrent in-flight-dependent seizures related to commercial airline flight in which the patient experienced a fatal air embolism secondary to a giant bronchogenic cyst.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT: A female airline passenger presented with a seizure, then unconsciousness and death. The patient had experienced 2 previous episodes of in-flight seizures without any sequelae.

RESULTS

The patient had an air embolism proved by findings on cranial computed tomography (CT) and a CT perfusion study. The embolism was secondary to a giant bronchogenic cyst that was evident on chest CT. The patient was examined after the previous episodes of in-flight seizures, but no chest radiography had been performed.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose minor air embolism as a cause of in-flight seizures. This type of seizure can signify the existence of a giant bronchogenic cyst. We believe that obtaining a chest radiograph can be useful in patients with a history of in-flight seizures to rule out the presence of a bronchogenic cyst and to prevent a possibly fatal air embolism.

Для цитирования: Arnaiz Javier, Marco de Lucas Enrique, Piedra Tatiana, Arnaiz Garcia Maria Elena, Patel Ashesh D, Gutierrez Agustin. In-flight seizures and fatal air embolism: the importance of a chest radiograph.. Archives of neurology. 2011. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.85.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.