Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2022
Psychoeducational Interventions and Postconcussive Recovery in Children and Adolescents: A Rapid Systematic Review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamba Gloria, Plourde Vickie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this rapid systematic review was to identify and synthesize results of empirical studies that have examined psychoeducational interventions provided to children and adolescents aged 5-19 recovering from a concussion and their families.
METHODS: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines adjusted for a rapid systematic review. We searched three databases (EMBASE, PsycInfo and MEDLINE) with key terms for concussion (or mild traumatic brain injury - mTBI), the intervention (psychoeducation, instructions, and reassurance) and the target population (children and adolescents aged 5 to 19). Our search strategy generated 2225 unique records and seven were included. We performed a quality appraisal on the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).
RESULTS: Results indicated that psychoeducational interventions had satisfactory feasibility results. Caregivers generally found the intervention to be useful to determine return to play (n=2) and understand consequences following a concussion (n=1). However, results from studies on post-concussive symptom improvement (n=4) and post-intervention concussion knowledge (n=2) showed variability and mixed findings. Methodological quality was low for most studies.
CONCLUSIONS: This present review shows that there are very few published studies on psychoeducational interventions offered to children, adolescents, and families for the post-concussion management. Current evidence suggests that those interventions are useful in guiding caregivers during their child's recovery. However, the impact of psychoeducational interventions on post-concussive recovery seems to be less clear.
METHODS: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines adjusted for a rapid systematic review. We searched three databases (EMBASE, PsycInfo and MEDLINE) with key terms for concussion (or mild traumatic brain injury - mTBI), the intervention (psychoeducation, instructions, and reassurance) and the target population (children and adolescents aged 5 to 19). Our search strategy generated 2225 unique records and seven were included. We performed a quality appraisal on the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).
RESULTS: Results indicated that psychoeducational interventions had satisfactory feasibility results. Caregivers generally found the intervention to be useful to determine return to play (n=2) and understand consequences following a concussion (n=1). However, results from studies on post-concussive symptom improvement (n=4) and post-intervention concussion knowledge (n=2) showed variability and mixed findings. Methodological quality was low for most studies.
CONCLUSIONS: This present review shows that there are very few published studies on psychoeducational interventions offered to children, adolescents, and families for the post-concussion management. Current evidence suggests that those interventions are useful in guiding caregivers during their child's recovery. However, the impact of psychoeducational interventions on post-concussive recovery seems to be less clear.