DOI 10.1080/00207454.2020.1847106
Acute parkinsonism in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report and review of the literature.
Аннотация
Purpose of the study: Parkinsonism in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is rare. This study reported a case of parkinsonism in SLE and reviewed the clinical features and outcomes of parkinsonism in SLE patients.
Methods
English language literature of parkinsonism in SLE patients was reviewed.
Results
There were 28 patients (19 adults and 9 children) with SLE and parkinsonism. Twenty-three patients were female. Of 26 patients whose disease duration was available parkinsonism occurred at SLE diagnosis and after SLE diagnosis in 6 and 20 patients, respectively. Twenty-five patients had active SLE. Hematologic, mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal systems were the 3 most common organs involved in SLE during parkinsonism onset. Rigidity, bradykinesia and resting tremor were the 3 most common parkinsonian symptoms. Compared with adults, child cases had significantly more psychosis (4 in 9 vs. 1 in 19, p = .026), seizures or psychosis (6 in 9 vs. 2 in 19, p = .005) and mutism (6 in 9 vs. none, p < .001). Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was abnormal in 13 of 24 patients. Eight of nine patients had abnormal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and 5 and 3 showed hypoperfusion and hyperperfusion, respectively. The outcomes were resolution, partial response and persistent symptoms in 17, 7 and 4 patients, respectively. The outcome was no different whether or not dopamine therapy was included to corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive drugs.
Conclusions
Parkinsonism in SLE usually occurs during active SLE disease. Good response to corticosteroid and/or immunosuppressive drugs supports the immunologic mechanism in the pathogenesis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.