MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0b013e31821c0d52

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2011

Pediatric facial trauma: a review of guidelines for assessment, evaluation, and management in the emergency department.

Ryan Mark Leo, Thorson Chad M, Otero Christian A, Ogilvie Michael P, Cheung Michael C, Saigal Gaurav M, Thaller Seth R

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Approximately 22 million children in the United States sustain traumatic injuries every year, the etiologies of which vary with age as well as social and environmental factors. If not managed properly, these injuries can have a significant impact on future growth and development. Evaluation of facial injuries presents a unique diagnostic challenge in this population, as differences from adult anatomy and physiology can result in vastly different injury profiles. The increased ratio of the cranial mass relative to the body leaves younger patients more vulnerable to craniofacial trauma. It is essential that the treating physician be aware of these variations to properly assess and treat this susceptible and fragile patient population and ensure optimal outcomes. This article reviews the proper emergency department assessment and treatment of facial fractures in the pediatric population as well as any associated injuries, with particular emphasis on initial patient stabilization, radiological evaluation, and therapeutic options.

Для цитирования: Ryan Mark Leo, Thorson Chad M, Otero Christian A, Ogilvie Michael P, Cheung Michael C, Saigal Gaurav M, Thaller Seth R. Pediatric facial trauma: a review of guidelines for assessment, evaluation, and management in the emergency department.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31821c0d52.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.