MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s1352465811000427

Медицинская библиотека · Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy · 2011

The role of cognition in school refusal: an investigation of automatic thoughts and cognitive errors.

Maric Marija, Heyne David A, de Heus Peter, van Widenfelt Brigit M, Westenberg P Michiel

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the cognitions of anxious school refusers. The cognitive constructs under investigation included negative cognition commonly linked to youth anxiety (i.e. negative automatic thoughts and cognitive errors) and positive automatic thoughts.

METHOD: The cognition of school refusers (n = 50) and youth from a community sample (n = 181) was assessed with the Children's Automatic Thoughts Scale-Negative/Positive and the Children's Negative Cognitive Error Questionnaire-Revised.

RESULTS

When controlling for anxiety, school refusers were found to report more negative automatic thoughts concerning personal failure, fewer negative automatic thoughts concerning hostility, and fewer positive automatic thoughts. Negative automatic thoughts concerning personal failure and hostility, and the negative cognitive error of overgeneralizing were found to independently predict school refusal.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the importance of further researching the role of cognition in the development, maintenance, and treatment of anxiety-based school refusal.

Для цитирования: Maric Marija, Heyne David A, de Heus Peter, van Widenfelt Brigit M, Westenberg P Michiel. The role of cognition in school refusal: an investigation of automatic thoughts and cognitive errors.. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. 2011. DOI: 10.1017/s1352465811000427.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.