MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2018.2017-0131

Медицинская библиотека · Revista gaucha de enfermagem · 2018

Association between Manchester Triage System discriminators and nursing diagnoses.

Franco Betina, Busin Lurdes, Chianca Tânia Couto Machado, Moraes Vítor Monteiro, Pires Ananda Ughini Bertoldo, Lucena Amália de Fátima

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the association between Manchester Triage System flowchart discriminators and nursing diagnoses in adult patients classified as clinical priority I (emergency) and II (very urgent).

METHOD: Cross-sectional study conducted in an emergency department in southern Brazil between April and August 2014. The sample included 219 patients. Data were collected from online patient medical records and data analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test or the chi-square test.

RESULTS

16 discriminators and 14 nursing diagnoses were identified. Associations were found between seven discriminators and five problem-focused nursing diagnoses, including the discriminator Cardiac pain and the diagnosis Acute pain. Three discriminators were associated with four risk nursing diagnoses, among these Acute neurological deficit with the diagnosis Risk of ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion.

CONCLUSION

Significant associations were found between Manchester Triage System discriminators and the nursing diagnoses most frequently established in the emergency department.

Для цитирования: Franco Betina, Busin Lurdes, Chianca Tânia Couto Machado, Moraes Vítor Monteiro, Pires Ananda Ughini Bertoldo, Lucena Amália de Fátima. Association between Manchester Triage System discriminators and nursing diagnoses.. Revista gaucha de enfermagem. 2018. DOI: 10.1590/1983-1447.2018.2017-0131.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.