MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000000374

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2014

Evaluation of treatment outcome in cleft maxillary hypoplasia treated by rigid external distractor: a cephalometric study.

Sahoo Nandakishore, Desai Ajay Premanand, Jayan Balakrishnan, Gupta Vishal

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to cephalometrically evaluate hard and soft tissue changes in cases of cleft-induced maxillary hypoplasia treated by distraction osteogenesis using rigid external distractor (RED).

METHODS

Fifteen cases of cleft-induced maxillary hypoplasia were selected applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The cases were operated on under general anesthesia for distraction osteogenesis using RED. Cephalometric evaluation was done at the end of presurgical orthodontics (C1), 1 week after removal of RED (C2), and at the end 12 months postoperatively (C3). The hard tissue parameters considered were Sella Nasion point A angle, Point A-Nasion-point B angle, distance from condylion to point A, anterior nasal spine-menton to Nasion-menton ratio, and upper incisor distance to N vertical. The soft tissue parameters included facial contour angle, nasolabial angle, upper lip to E-line, and lower lip to E-line.

RESULT: There were 8 males and 7 females with an average age of 13.07 years. The range of maxillary advancement was 8 to 24.5 mm with an average of 14.46 mm. The cephalometric data were compared using paired t test and 1-way analysis-of-variance test. All the hard tissue changes except SNB were statistically highly significant (P > 0.0001). The percentage of relapse was 13.72% at SNA, 13.3% at ANB, 9.83% for maxillary depth, 8.99% for distance of the upper incisor to N perpendicular and 20.73% for facial contour angle, 2.16% for nasolabial angle, 25.69% for distance of UL to E-line, and 25.12% for distance of LL to E-line. Soft tissue relapse except nasolabial angle after 1 year was more as compared with hard tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

All the cephalometric parameters except SNB angle showed significant improvement. However, the significant percentage of relapse should be considered in the preoperative planning.

Для цитирования: Sahoo Nandakishore, Desai Ajay Premanand, Jayan Balakrishnan, Gupta Vishal. Evaluation of treatment outcome in cleft maxillary hypoplasia treated by rigid external distractor: a cephalometric study.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000000374.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.