Mortality following severe liver trauma is declining at Auckland City Hospital: a 14-year experience, 2006-2020.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Liver injuries sustained in blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma may cause serious patient morbidity and even mortality.
AIM: To review the recent experience of liver trauma at Auckland City Hospital, describing the mechanism of injury, patient management, outcomes and complications.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort study was performed, including all patients admitted to Auckland City Hospital with liver trauma identified from the trauma registry. Patient clinical records and radiology were systematically examined.
RESULTS
Between 2006-2020, 450 patients were admitted with liver trauma, of whom 92 patients (20%) were transferred from other hospitals. Blunt injury mechanisms, most commonly motor-vehicle crashes, predominated (87%). Stabbings were the most common penetrating mechanism. Over half of liver injuries were low risk American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade I and II (56%), whereas 20% were severe grade IV and V. Non-operative management was undertaken in 72% of patients with blunt liver trauma and 92% of patients with penetrating liver trauma underwent surgery. Liver complications occurred in 11% of patients, most commonly bile leaks (7%), followed by delayed haemorrhage (2%). Thirty-two patients died (7%), with co-existing severe traumatic brain injury as the leading cause of death. There was a significant reduction in death from haemorrhage in patients with grade IV and V liver trauma between the first and second half of the study period (p=0.0091).
CONCLUSION
Although the incidence and severity of liver trauma at Auckland City Hospital remained stable, there was a reduction in mortality, particularly death as a result of haemorrhage.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.