Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia · 2011
Phonological remediation program in students with learning difficulties.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Silva Ana Paula de Castro, Capellini Simone Aparecida
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To verify the effectiveness of a phonological remediation program in students with learning difficulties.
METHODS: Forty students from 2nd to 4th grades, from both genders, ranging from eight years and one month to 12 years old, were divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1), composed by 20 students with learning disabilities; and Group 2 (G2), composed by 20 students without learning disabilities. The Cognitive-Linguistic Performance Test and the oral reading and comprehension were applied in pre-test and post-test situations in all students. After the pre-test, only the students from Group 1 were submitted to the phonological remediation program.
RESULTS: After the phonological remediation program, Group 1 presented differences for reading abilities, auditory and visual processing, and processing speed, evidenced by superior performance in the post-testing situation.
CONCLUSION: The phonological remediation program was efficient to the development of cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and text comprehension of students with learning difficulties.
METHODS: Forty students from 2nd to 4th grades, from both genders, ranging from eight years and one month to 12 years old, were divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1), composed by 20 students with learning disabilities; and Group 2 (G2), composed by 20 students without learning disabilities. The Cognitive-Linguistic Performance Test and the oral reading and comprehension were applied in pre-test and post-test situations in all students. After the pre-test, only the students from Group 1 were submitted to the phonological remediation program.
RESULTS: After the phonological remediation program, Group 1 presented differences for reading abilities, auditory and visual processing, and processing speed, evidenced by superior performance in the post-testing situation.
CONCLUSION: The phonological remediation program was efficient to the development of cognitive-linguistic skills and reading and text comprehension of students with learning difficulties.