The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2012
Frequency of surgical correction for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oberoi Snehlata, Hoffman William Y, Chigurupati Radhika, Vargervik Karin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of surgical correction of maxillary hypoplasia in individuals with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) treated at the Center for Craniofacial Anomalies at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).
SUBJECTS: This is a retrospective cohort study of individuals with cleft lip and/or palate born between 1970 and 1990 who were treated at the UCSF Center for Craniofacial Anomalies. Data were gathered from the UCSF Craniofacial Anomalies Filemaker Pro database.
METHODS: From the database, we collected the following information: age, gender, cleft type, date of orthognathic surgery, and type of osteotomy. The subjects were further subcategorized by cleft type and gender.
RESULTS: A total of 973 individuals with a diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate were reviewed: 325 subjects had an associated syndrome and 648 were nonsyndromic. A total of 59 of these 648 nonsyndromic cleft individuals (9.1%) required surgical intervention for correction of maxillary hypoplasia: 2/105 (1.9%) for cleft lip, 4/122 (3.3%) for cleft palate, 35/286 (12.2%) for unilateral cleft lip and palate, and 18/135 (13.3%) for bilateral cleft lip and palate.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of surgical correction for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft individuals at UCSF Center for Craniofacial Anomalies at 9% was lower than the reported average of 25%.
SUBJECTS: This is a retrospective cohort study of individuals with cleft lip and/or palate born between 1970 and 1990 who were treated at the UCSF Center for Craniofacial Anomalies. Data were gathered from the UCSF Craniofacial Anomalies Filemaker Pro database.
METHODS: From the database, we collected the following information: age, gender, cleft type, date of orthognathic surgery, and type of osteotomy. The subjects were further subcategorized by cleft type and gender.
RESULTS: A total of 973 individuals with a diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate were reviewed: 325 subjects had an associated syndrome and 648 were nonsyndromic. A total of 59 of these 648 nonsyndromic cleft individuals (9.1%) required surgical intervention for correction of maxillary hypoplasia: 2/105 (1.9%) for cleft lip, 4/122 (3.3%) for cleft palate, 35/286 (12.2%) for unilateral cleft lip and palate, and 18/135 (13.3%) for bilateral cleft lip and palate.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of surgical correction for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft individuals at UCSF Center for Craniofacial Anomalies at 9% was lower than the reported average of 25%.