MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/mds.21735

Медицинская библиотека · Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2007

The international cooperative ataxia rating scale in Machado-Joseph disease. Comparison with the unified multiple system atrophy rating scale.

D'Abreu Anelyssa, Franca Marcondes, Lopes-Cendes Iscia, Cendes Fernando

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Our purpose was to evaluate and compare the international cooperative ataxia rating scale (ICARS) and the unified multiple system atrophy rating scale (UMSARS) in patients with Machado-Joseph disease (MJD). We assessed 52 consecutive subjects with MJD using each scale. Both scales had adequate internal consistency (alpha > 0.90), except for the oculomotor (OD) subscore (alpha = 0.08). Patients with dystonia had the highest scores in both scales, and symptoms other than ataxia clearly confounded the total ICARS score. There was a very strong correlation between the ICARS and UMSARS-II (motor function), and the correlations between the ICARS and UMSARS-I (r = 0.79) (history) and UMSARS-IV (r = 0.69) (disability) were also statistically significant. We found no significant changes in scores after a mean interval of 7.7 months, although there was after a mean interval of 13.3 months. We conclude that the total ICARS score is a reliable method for longitudinal evaluation of ataxia in MJD, but a disease specific scale should be developed.

Для цитирования: D'Abreu Anelyssa, Franca Marcondes, Lopes-Cendes Iscia, Cendes Fernando. The international cooperative ataxia rating scale in Machado-Joseph disease. Comparison with the unified multiple system atrophy rating scale.. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2007. DOI: 10.1002/mds.21735.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.