MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11881-005-0014-7

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of dyslexia · 2005

Teachers' literacy-related knowledge and self-perceptions in relation to preparation and experience.

Spear-Swerling Louise, Brucker Pamela Owen, Alfano Michael P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

After rating their own literacy-related knowledge in three areas (knowledge about reading/reading development, phonemic awareness/phonics, and morpheme awareness/structural analysis), graduate teacher-education students completed five tasks intended to measure their actual disciplinary knowledge in these areas. Teachers with high levels of prior background (i.e., course preparation and experience) rated themselves as significantly more knowledgeable than did low-background teachers in all areas; high-background participants also significantly outperformed low-background participants on all tasks. However, even high-background teachers scored well below ceiling on the tasks. Regression analyses indicated that teachers' self-perceptions and knowledge were positively influenced by both level of preparation and teaching experience, although the influences on teachers' knowledge differed by task. Teachers had some accurate perceptions of their own knowledge, especially in the area of phonics. Results suggest that differentiating levels of preparation may be useful in studying teacher knowledge, and also support the notion of a substantial gap between research on reading and teacher preparation in reading.

Для цитирования: Spear-Swerling Louise, Brucker Pamela Owen, Alfano Michael P. Teachers' literacy-related knowledge and self-perceptions in relation to preparation and experience.. Annals of dyslexia. 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-005-0014-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.