Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie · 2001
[Current research in search of neurobiological correlates of reading and spelling disorder].
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Breitenbach E, Lenhard W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The present article provides an overview of the main approaches in the current literature on the neurobiological correlates of developmental dyslexia.
METHODS: Approximately 120 articles, published mainly within the past six years, were analyzed.
RESULTS: Three topics are of focal interest: first, the point of unusual asymmetries of the temporal plana and deviations of the corpus callosum; second, the analysis of abnormal patterns of activation of the left hemispherical frontal and temporal lobes. In this context, a dysfunction of the angular gyrus is discussed. The third approach postulates that global deficits of subcortical systems concerning the temporal procession of acoustic and visual information play a major role in the cause of dyslexia.
CONCLUSIONS: The first approach is not specific enough with regard to negative results, whereas the second and third seem particularly promising.
METHODS: Approximately 120 articles, published mainly within the past six years, were analyzed.
RESULTS: Three topics are of focal interest: first, the point of unusual asymmetries of the temporal plana and deviations of the corpus callosum; second, the analysis of abnormal patterns of activation of the left hemispherical frontal and temporal lobes. In this context, a dysfunction of the angular gyrus is discussed. The third approach postulates that global deficits of subcortical systems concerning the temporal procession of acoustic and visual information play a major role in the cause of dyslexia.
CONCLUSIONS: The first approach is not specific enough with regard to negative results, whereas the second and third seem particularly promising.