MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1024//1422-4917.28.3.188

Медицинская библиотека · Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie · 2000

[Diagnostic testing methods for skill assessment in reading, writing, and arithmetic. A critical review].

Hemminger U, Roth E, Schneck S, Jans T, Warnke A

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of a specific developmental disorder of reading, writing and arithmetic can be made based upon individually applied standardized methods for testing scholastic achievement and IQ. To make the choice of suitable methods easier for the administrator of the test, a critical survey of German-language methods for assessing skills in reading, writing and arithmetic is presented.

METHODS

Test intention and psychometric properties for scholastic achievement are summarized. The methods are assessed with regard to their utility in the diagnosis of congenital alexia and dyscalculia. Supplementary suggestions for clinical assessment are given.

RESULTS

In summary, beyond the primary school area there is a lack of current standardized methods that meet the current standards of quality. Particularly the assessment of arithmetic skills above those of the 4th grade level require resorting to methods of dubious curricular validity. Coverage is once again better for the upper elementary and middle school levels.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for new constructions, respectively a need to update published scholastic achievement tests.

Для цитирования: Hemminger U, Roth E, Schneck S, Jans T, Warnke A. [Diagnostic testing methods for skill assessment in reading, writing, and arithmetic. A critical review].. Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. 2000. DOI: 10.1024//1422-4917.28.3.188.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.