MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/(sici)1099-0909(200001/03)6:1<42::aid-dys157>3.0.co;2-0

Медицинская библиотека · Dyslexia (Chichester, England) · 2000

Dyslexia screening measures and bilingualism.

Everatt J, Smythe I, Adams E, Ocampo D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A series of measures used in a number of dyslexia screening tests was administered to groups of 7-8-year old English monolinguals and Sylheti/English bilinguals. Within these groups a subgroup of children was distinguished by poor spelling and reading in the absence of general ability, sensory, emotional or behavioural problems, i.e. specific literacy difficulties (SpLD). General ability (assessed by Raven's matrices), chronological age, male/female ratio and mono/bilingualism were controlled between SpLD and control groups. Screening measures assessed phonological skills, rapid naming, the ability to recite or repeat sequences of verbal and non-verbal stimuli, and visual and motor skills. Sample sizes were small owing to the selection criteria used and the small number of bilingual SpLD children identified. However, the results were encouraging in differentiating SpLD bilinguals from their peers, with the phonological measures in particular presenting consistent findings across bilingual and monolingual groupings. Those differences found between bilinguals and monolinguals are discussed in terms of a bilingual influence on the skills assessed or the reduced reliability of the measure.

Для цитирования: Everatt J, Smythe I, Adams E, Ocampo D. Dyslexia screening measures and bilingualism.. Dyslexia (Chichester, England). 2000. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0909(200001/03)6:1<42::aid-dys157>3.0.co;2-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.