MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/ijerph14070805

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017

Comparison of Annoyance from Railway Noise and Railway Vibration.

Ögren Mikael, Gidlöf-Gunnarsson Anita, Smith Michael, Gustavsson Sara, Persson Waye Kerstin

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of this study is to compare vibration exposure to noise exposure from railway traffic in terms of equal annoyance, i.e., to determine when a certain noise level is equally annoying as a corresponding vibration velocity. Based on questionnaire data from the Train Vibration and Noise Effects (TVANE) research project from residential areas exposed to railway noise and vibration, the dose response relationship for annoyance was estimated. By comparing the relationships between exposure and annoyance for areas both with and without significant vibration exposure, the noise levels and vibration velocities that had an equal probability of causing annoyance was determined using logistic regression. The comparison gives a continuous mapping between vibration velocity in the ground and a corresponding noise level at the facade that are equally annoying. For equivalent noise level at the facade compared to maximum weighted vibration velocity in the ground the probability of annoyance is approximately 20% for 59 dB or 0.48 mm/s, and about 40% for 63 dB or 0.98 mm/s.

Для цитирования: Ögren Mikael, Gidlöf-Gunnarsson Anita, Smith Michael, Gustavsson Sara, Persson Waye Kerstin. Comparison of Annoyance from Railway Noise and Railway Vibration.. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2017. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14070805.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.