Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024
Biomechanical study of the stability of posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation: a finite element analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Kunpeng, Yu Qun, Wang Chongyi, Zhang Runtong, Fu Qingyang, Feng Yunze, Liu Chen, Wang Xinlong, Zhang Ronghan, Li Le, Si Haipeng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty (EODL) may cause postoperative C5 palsy, and it can be avoided by EODL with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy. However, prophylactic C4/5 foraminotomy can compromise cervical spine stability. To prevent postoperative C5 palsy and boost cervical stability, We propose a new operation method: EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation. However, there are no studies on the biomechanical properties of this surgery.
PURPOSE: Evaluating the biomechanical characteristics of EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation and other three classic surgery.
METHODS: An original model (A) and four surgical models (B-E) of the C2-T1 vertebrae of a female patient were constructed. (B) EODL; (C) EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy; (D) C3-6 expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation; (E) C3-6 expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and C3-6 lateral mass screw system. To compare the biomechanical properties of cervical posterior internal fixation; (E) C3-6 expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and C3-6 lateral mass screw system. To compare the biomechanical properties of cervical posterior internal fixation methods, six physiological motion states were simulated for the five models using a 100N load force and 1.5Nm torque. The biomechanical advantages of the four internal fixation systems were evaluated by comparing the ranges of motion (ROMs) and maximum stresses.
RESULTS: The overall ROM of Model C outperformed the other four models, reaching a maximum ROM in the extension state of 10.59°±0.04°. Model C showed a significantly higher ROMs of C4/5 segment than other four models. Model D showed a significantly lower ROM of C4/5 segment than both Model B and Model C. Model E showed a significantly lower ROM of C4/5 segment than Model D. The stress in the four surgical models were mainly concentrated on the internal fixation systems.
CONCLUSION: EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation can maintain the stability of the spine and has minimal effects on the patient's cervical spine ROMs in the extension and flexion state. As a result, it may be a promising treatment option for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to prevention of postoperative C5 palsy.
PURPOSE: Evaluating the biomechanical characteristics of EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation and other three classic surgery.
METHODS: An original model (A) and four surgical models (B-E) of the C2-T1 vertebrae of a female patient were constructed. (B) EODL; (C) EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy; (D) C3-6 expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation; (E) C3-6 expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and C3-6 lateral mass screw system. To compare the biomechanical properties of cervical posterior internal fixation; (E) C3-6 expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and C3-6 lateral mass screw system. To compare the biomechanical properties of cervical posterior internal fixation methods, six physiological motion states were simulated for the five models using a 100N load force and 1.5Nm torque. The biomechanical advantages of the four internal fixation systems were evaluated by comparing the ranges of motion (ROMs) and maximum stresses.
RESULTS: The overall ROM of Model C outperformed the other four models, reaching a maximum ROM in the extension state of 10.59°±0.04°. Model C showed a significantly higher ROMs of C4/5 segment than other four models. Model D showed a significantly lower ROM of C4/5 segment than both Model B and Model C. Model E showed a significantly lower ROM of C4/5 segment than Model D. The stress in the four surgical models were mainly concentrated on the internal fixation systems.
CONCLUSION: EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation can maintain the stability of the spine and has minimal effects on the patient's cervical spine ROMs in the extension and flexion state. As a result, it may be a promising treatment option for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to prevention of postoperative C5 palsy.