MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2500/aap.2025.46.250018

Медицинская библиотека · Allergy and asthma proceedings · 2025

Cost-effectiveness of school integrated pest management and air filtration in students with asthma.

Socolovsky Carmela, Louisias Margee, Alsulami Saleh, Petty Carter R, Trivedi Michelle, Lai Peggy S, Cunningham Amparito, Gaffin Jonathan, Thorne Peter, Coull Brent, Koutrakis Petros, Baccarelli Andrea, Gold Diane R, Adamkiewicz Gary, Permaul Perdita, Banzon Tina, Hauptman Marissa, Bartnikas Lisa M, Baxi Sachin, Sheehan William J, Phipatanakul Wanda, Samnaliev Mihail

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

The cost-effectiveness of school environmental remediation in asthma is not known. The School Inner City Asthma Intervention Study (SICAS2) was a randomized controlled trial that assessed school integrated pest management (IPM) and classroom high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration on asthma morbidity in urban schools.

Objective

The objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SICAS2.

Methods

We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective that compared four interventions: IPM, HEPA, IPM + HEPA, and no intervention. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were derived from the EuroQol-5 Dimension-Youth and EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 levels instruments. Total costs (2021 U.S. dollars) included intervention cost, cost of caregiver productivity impacted by child school absenteeism, and health-care utilization costs (e.g., emergency department visits). The evaluation period was based on a mean follow-up time of 166 days. Sensitivity analyses were performed by using cost estimates 50% above and below initial cost benchmarks.

Results

A total of 154 SICAS2 participants were included. Intervention costs per student were $12.21 (IPM + HEPA), $7.27 (IPM), and $4.94 (HEPA). Sequential analyses revealed that IPM + HEPA was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $19,667 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated stability, with variability in probability estimates not exceeding 10%.

Conclusion

IPM + HEPA demonstrated good value to society, which reflected the low cost and the economic impact of missed school days. This intervention may have a pronounced benefit for historically minoritized and marginalized children in urban schools who are disproportionately exposed to air pollution and indoor allergens. The SICAS2 intervention may offer a cost-effective tool to target proximal causes of disparities even in the most resource-limited schools.

Для цитирования: Socolovsky Carmela, Louisias Margee, Alsulami Saleh, Petty Carter R, Trivedi Michelle, Lai Peggy S, Cunningham Amparito, Gaffin Jonathan, Thorne Peter, Coull Brent, Koutrakis Petros, Baccarelli Andrea, Gold Diane R, Adamkiewicz Gary, Permaul Perdita, Banzon Tina, Hauptman Marissa, Bartnikas Lisa M, Baxi Sachin, Sheehan William J, Phipatanakul Wanda, Samnaliev Mihail. Cost-effectiveness of school integrated pest management and air filtration in students with asthma.. Allergy and asthma proceedings. 2025. DOI: 10.2500/aap.2025.46.250018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.