MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/pcc.0b013e31829f5c09

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2013

Continuous renal replacement therapy with an automated monitor is superior to a free-flow system during extracorporeal life support.

Symons Jordan Matthew, McMahon Marcus Wayne, Karamlou Tara, Parrish Andrea Rae, McMullan David Michael

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether integrated continuous renal replacement therapy provides more accurate fluid management than IV pump free-flow ultrafiltration in pediatric patients on extracorporeal life support.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

PICU and neonatal ICU in a tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS: Infants and children less than 18 years old.

INTERVENTIONS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Clinical data collected on patients who received free-flow or integrated renal replacement therapy while on extracorporeal life support. Normalized ultrafiltration error was calculated as: (physician specified fluid loss per 24-hr period - actual fluid loss per 24-hr period) divided by patient body weight (kg). Mixed linear regression analyses were used to model longitudinal ultrafiltration error trajectories within each mode of ultrafiltration. Based on an analysis of 458 serial ultrafiltration fluid balance measurements, integrated ultrafiltration was significantly more accurate than free-flow ultrafiltration (normalized ultrafiltration error of 1.2 vs 13.1 mL; p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient factors and time, integrated ultrafiltration was associated with a significantly lower normalized ultrafiltration error (variable estimate, -24 ± 6; p < 0.001). The use of integrated ultrafiltration was associated with shorter duration of extracorporeal life support (384 vs 583 hr, p < 0.001) and renal replacement therapy (185 vs 477 hr, p < 0.001) than free-flow patients. Overall ICU and hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While free-flow ultrafiltration has the advantages of simplicity and low cost, integrated renal replacement therapy provides more accurate fluid management during extracorporeal life support. Better fluid status management with integrated renal replacement therapy may contribute to shorter duration of extracorporeal life support.

Для цитирования: Symons Jordan Matthew, McMahon Marcus Wayne, Karamlou Tara, Parrish Andrea Rae, McMullan David Michael. Continuous renal replacement therapy with an automated monitor is superior to a free-flow system during extracorporeal life support.. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0b013e31829f5c09.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.