PloS one · 2026
The effectiveness of a Mindful Yoga and Common Yoga intervention on emotion regulation and well-being of adolescents; A nonrandomized quasi-experimental study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
K Jobin, Ashok Lena, Manjula M, J J Teddy Andrews, R Vani Lakshmi, John Soyuz
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Yoga programs have gained wide attention in school settings to promote adolescent mental health. However, comparative evaluations of distinct yoga-based approaches are limited. This study examined the effectiveness of a Mindful Yoga and Meditation (MYM) program and the Common Yoga Protocol (CYP) in reducing psychological distress and enhancing mindfulness, emotion regulation, and overall well-being among secondary school students in India.
METHODS: The study employed a quasi-experimental design. A total of 147 students were assigned to three groups: MYM, CYP, and waitlist-control. Both interventions were conducted over 21 days, with assessments at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3). The outcome measures included psychological distress (K10), mindfulness (CAMM), emotion regulation (ERQ-CA), and well-being (WHO-5). A linear mixed model was employed to examine the main effects of group and time, as well as the group × time interaction, across all outcome measures.
RESULTS: Both the MYM and CYP groups showed significant improvements compared to the control group. The MYM participants demonstrated greater and more sustained gains in mindfulness (p < .001), cognitive reappraisal (p = .026), and well-being (p < .001), along with larger reductions in distress (p < .001) and expressive suppression (p < .001). While CYP was effective, its benefits were comparatively smaller and less durable when compared to MYM. No significant changes were observed in the control group.
CONCLUSION: The findings support the feasibility and effectiveness of brief school-based yoga interventions in promoting adolescent mental health. Importantly, integrating mindfulness into yoga practices (as in MYM) yielded superior outcomes, emphasizing the added value of mindful components.
METHODS: The study employed a quasi-experimental design. A total of 147 students were assigned to three groups: MYM, CYP, and waitlist-control. Both interventions were conducted over 21 days, with assessments at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3). The outcome measures included psychological distress (K10), mindfulness (CAMM), emotion regulation (ERQ-CA), and well-being (WHO-5). A linear mixed model was employed to examine the main effects of group and time, as well as the group × time interaction, across all outcome measures.
RESULTS: Both the MYM and CYP groups showed significant improvements compared to the control group. The MYM participants demonstrated greater and more sustained gains in mindfulness (p < .001), cognitive reappraisal (p = .026), and well-being (p < .001), along with larger reductions in distress (p < .001) and expressive suppression (p < .001). While CYP was effective, its benefits were comparatively smaller and less durable when compared to MYM. No significant changes were observed in the control group.
CONCLUSION: The findings support the feasibility and effectiveness of brief school-based yoga interventions in promoting adolescent mental health. Importantly, integrating mindfulness into yoga practices (as in MYM) yielded superior outcomes, emphasizing the added value of mindful components.