m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The oncologist · 2026

Patient, care partner, and oncologist perspectives on clinically important survival thresholds after considering time toxicity in advanced cancer.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Gupta Arjun, Lin Kendall, Jansen Rick J, Stevens Samuel X, George Manju, Breininger Allison, Booth Christopher M, Parsons Helen M, Ziegenfuss Jeanette Y, Vogel Rachel I, Blaes Anne H

Аннотация

A treatment's time toxicity (measured using contact days) can decrease days spent at home (home days). We evaluated the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and non-inferiority margin (NIM) of home days, and treatment acceptance when all additional survival time was spent in health care by surveying people with lived (patients, n = 42; informal care partners, n = 29) and professional (oncologists, n = 8) experience of advanced cancer. All 3 groups reported similar MCIDs and NIMs (6-month survival; median MCID range, 14-15; P = .79; median NIM range, 5-11; P = .14). Care partners (48%) and patients (21%) more often accepted 2-week survival gains without an increase in home days than oncologists (0%), P = .09. Caregivers reported altruism guided their responses, and clinicians' responses in stated-preference work may differ from revealed-preferences in the clinic. By empirically deriving MCID/NIM for home days and evaluating treatment acceptance, this work will aid trial design and decision studies using an endpoint of home days.

Предметные рубрики MeSH