MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078029

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2024

Common practices for sociodemographic data reporting in digital mental health intervention research: a scoping review.

Kirvin-Quamme Andrew, Kissinger Jennifer, Quinlan Laurel, Montgomery Robert, Chernenok Mariya, Pirner Maddison C, Pajarito Sarah, Rapoport Stephanie, Wicks Paul, Darcy Alison, Greene Carolyn J, Robinson Athena

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The ability of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) to reduce mental health disparities relies on the recruitment of research participants with diverse sociodemographic and self-identity characteristics. Despite its importance, sociodemographic reporting in research is often limited, and the state of reporting practices in DMHI research in particular has not been comprehensively reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To characterise the state of sociodemographic data reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of app-based DMHIs published globally from 2007 to 2022.

METHODS

A scoping review of RCTs of app-based DMHIs examined reporting frequency for 16 sociodemographic domains (eg, gender) and common category options within each domain (eg, woman). The search queried five electronic databases. 5079 records were screened and 299 articles were included.

RESULTS

On average, studies reported 4.64 (SD=1.79; range 0-9) of 16 sociodemographic domains. The most common were age (97%) and education (67%). The least common were housing situation (6%), residency/location (5%), veteran status (4%), number of children (3%), sexual orientation (2%), disability status (2%) and food security (<1%). Gender or sex was reported in 98% of studies: gender only (51%), sex only (28%), both (<1%) and gender/sex reported but unspecified (18%). Race or ethnicity was reported in 48% of studies: race only (14%), ethnicity only (14%), both (10%) and race/ethnicity reported but unspecified (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

This review describes the widespread underreporting of sociodemographic information in RCTs of app-based DMHIs published from 2007 to 2022. Reporting was often incomplete (eg, % female only), unclear (eg, the conflation of gender/sex) and limited (eg, only options representing majority groups were reported). Trends suggest reporting has somewhat improved in recent years. Diverse participant populations must be welcomed and described in DMHI research to broaden learning and the generalisability of results, a prerequisite of DMHI's potential to reduce disparities in mental healthcare.

Для цитирования: Kirvin-Quamme Andrew, Kissinger Jennifer, Quinlan Laurel, Montgomery Robert, Chernenok Mariya, Pirner Maddison C, Pajarito Sarah, Rapoport Stephanie, Wicks Paul, Darcy Alison, Greene Carolyn J, Robinson Athena. Common practices for sociodemographic data reporting in digital mental health intervention research: a scoping review.. BMJ open. 2024. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078029.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.