The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2018
Accuracy of photogrammetry for detecting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis progression.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leal Jefferson Soares, Aroeira Rozilene Maria Cota, Gressler Vinicius, Greco Marcelo, Pertence Antônio Eustáquio M, Lamounier Joel Alves
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The gold standard method of monitoring the evolution of scoliosis has been serial standing, posteroanterior, full-length spine radiographs with curvature measurements using the Cobb method. However, over the course of follow-up, patients can receive high radiation doses. Various studies have shown that repeated exposure to radiation in children and adolescents can be harmful to their health.
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of photogrammetry in evaluating the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in comparison with radiography.
STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic study.
PATIENT SAMPLE: Ninety adolescents subjected to radiographic follow-up of idiopathic scoliosis.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The angle of scoliotic curvature was measured using the Cobb radiographic method and photogrammetry. An increase of 5° or more between two radiographic exams was considered a progression of the curvature and was defined as the standard for calculations of sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and accuracy of the photogrammetric method for measuring scoliosis progression.
METHODS: Patients were subjected to radiographic and photogrammetric exams concomitantly and were reevaluated after an average of 8.6 months. The exams were analyzed separately and independently by two examiners for progression of scoliosis.
RESULTS: The measurements of the curves at the beginning of the study were 39.5±16.7° and 39.5±14.3° for radiographic and photogrammetric exams, respectively (p=1.0). At the end of the study, the measurements of the curves were 40.2±16.2° and 41.3±15.1° for the radiographic and photogrammetric exams, respectively (p=.310). The photogrammetric method had an accuracy of 89% (Confidence interval [CI] 95%=82.5-95.5) for the detection of scoliosis progression, with a sensitivity of 94.4% (CI 95%=89.6-99.2), a specificity of 86.7% (CI 95%=79.7-93.7), a positive predictive value of 75.5% (CI 95%=66.6-84.4), a negative predictive value of 97.2% (CI 95%=93.8-100), and a Kappa index of 0.75 (CI 95%=66.1-83.9). The interclass correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.74 (CI 95%=0.65-0.81; p=0).
CONCLUSIONS: The photogrammetric method showed good performance for detecting the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in comparison with the radiographic exam method.
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of photogrammetry in evaluating the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in comparison with radiography.
STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic study.
PATIENT SAMPLE: Ninety adolescents subjected to radiographic follow-up of idiopathic scoliosis.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The angle of scoliotic curvature was measured using the Cobb radiographic method and photogrammetry. An increase of 5° or more between two radiographic exams was considered a progression of the curvature and was defined as the standard for calculations of sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and accuracy of the photogrammetric method for measuring scoliosis progression.
METHODS: Patients were subjected to radiographic and photogrammetric exams concomitantly and were reevaluated after an average of 8.6 months. The exams were analyzed separately and independently by two examiners for progression of scoliosis.
RESULTS: The measurements of the curves at the beginning of the study were 39.5±16.7° and 39.5±14.3° for radiographic and photogrammetric exams, respectively (p=1.0). At the end of the study, the measurements of the curves were 40.2±16.2° and 41.3±15.1° for the radiographic and photogrammetric exams, respectively (p=.310). The photogrammetric method had an accuracy of 89% (Confidence interval [CI] 95%=82.5-95.5) for the detection of scoliosis progression, with a sensitivity of 94.4% (CI 95%=89.6-99.2), a specificity of 86.7% (CI 95%=79.7-93.7), a positive predictive value of 75.5% (CI 95%=66.6-84.4), a negative predictive value of 97.2% (CI 95%=93.8-100), and a Kappa index of 0.75 (CI 95%=66.1-83.9). The interclass correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.74 (CI 95%=0.65-0.81; p=0).
CONCLUSIONS: The photogrammetric method showed good performance for detecting the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in comparison with the radiographic exam method.