Journal of primary care & community health · 2026
Addressing Employment Barriers Among Persons with Homeless Experiences: Implementation Lessons For Advancing Equity From an Electronic-Bicycle-Supported Vocational Rehabilitation Pilot.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Panadero Talia J, Castellon Mikayla O, Jacobo Edwin M, Stigers Peter J, Raja Pushpa, Gabrielian Sonya E
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: To combat persistent health and social disparities, the VA Greater Los Angeles and its community partners piloted a novel vocational rehabilitation program that employed persons who have experienced homelessness (PEHs) as app-based food deliverers. The program focused on removing barriers to employment, providing subsidized electronic bicycles for deliveries and personal use; "priority status" as deliverers; and access to financial literacy coaching. We aimed to characterize program experiences, with a lens toward program scale-up.
METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 6 participants and 5 vocational rehabilitation staff. Interviews explored motivations to participate (among participants), and program strengths/challenges. Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative methods.
RESULTS: PEHs reported high motivation to participate due to the e-bike and flexible scheduling of work duties. Interviewees reported positive program impacts including: financial relief; reduced transportation barriers; and improved mental health. Suggesting for improvement included enhanced technical support (with the app and e-bike); improved communication among program partners; and more individualized employment opportunities.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the value of this novel vocational rehabilitation model for PEHs. Specific recommendations for program scale-up include a centralized platform for participant technical support requests; and regular communication and data sharing agreements between implementation partners.
METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 6 participants and 5 vocational rehabilitation staff. Interviews explored motivations to participate (among participants), and program strengths/challenges. Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative methods.
RESULTS: PEHs reported high motivation to participate due to the e-bike and flexible scheduling of work duties. Interviewees reported positive program impacts including: financial relief; reduced transportation barriers; and improved mental health. Suggesting for improvement included enhanced technical support (with the app and e-bike); improved communication among program partners; and more individualized employment opportunities.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the value of this novel vocational rehabilitation model for PEHs. Specific recommendations for program scale-up include a centralized platform for participant technical support requests; and regular communication and data sharing agreements between implementation partners.