Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025
Expert opinions on pediatric EEG training for non-epilepsy specialists in sub-Saharan Africa.
СтатьяConsensus StatementНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kander Veena, Valente Kette D, Carrizosa Jaime, Vidaurre Jorge, Patel Archana A, Triki Chahnez Charfi, Aljandeel Ghaieb, Singh Gagandeep, Kato Mitsuhiro, Seck Lala, Kone Zeinab, Beniczky Sándor, Asukile Melody T, Birbeck Gretchen L, Jones Kevin, Boylan Geraldine, Hardman Joanne, Wilmshurst Jo M
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Ideally, pediatric electroencephalograms (EEGs) should be performed by accredited neurophysiology technologists and interpreted by specialists trained in epileptology However, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack such specialists.
AIM: To collate expert consensus on essential curriculum content for non-epilepsy specialists in EEG interpretation and safe post-training practice.
METHOD: A qualitative study on pediatric EEG training curricula needs was designed in collaboration with an adult education specialist. Data were collected via interviews from 15 epilepsy experts with training experience across high- to low-income settings. Thematic analysis was used to identify sub-themes. The experts voted on the key statements in a two-round Delphi to ascertain consensus.
RESULTS: Twelve aspects of pediatric EEG training were identified and categorized thematically: relevance; exposure to pediatrics; focus on pediatrics; barriers; resource-limited setting; entry skills; best pedagogy; assessment; critical skills; reinforcement of skills; training model; and recommendations.
CONCLUSION: This study was driven by the inadequate access to training in pediatric EEG for non-epilepsy specialists, which is further exacerbated by the lack of epileptologists and neurophysiologists. The outcomes from the expert consensus opinions promoted consolidation, adaptation, and evolution of existing models that are viable for practice and to be used worldwide. The Delphi consensus demonstrated alignment among regionally located specialists towards the promotion of effective and maintained training for non-epilepsy specialists, as well as highlighting barriers that should be considered and addressed.
AIM: To collate expert consensus on essential curriculum content for non-epilepsy specialists in EEG interpretation and safe post-training practice.
METHOD: A qualitative study on pediatric EEG training curricula needs was designed in collaboration with an adult education specialist. Data were collected via interviews from 15 epilepsy experts with training experience across high- to low-income settings. Thematic analysis was used to identify sub-themes. The experts voted on the key statements in a two-round Delphi to ascertain consensus.
RESULTS: Twelve aspects of pediatric EEG training were identified and categorized thematically: relevance; exposure to pediatrics; focus on pediatrics; barriers; resource-limited setting; entry skills; best pedagogy; assessment; critical skills; reinforcement of skills; training model; and recommendations.
CONCLUSION: This study was driven by the inadequate access to training in pediatric EEG for non-epilepsy specialists, which is further exacerbated by the lack of epileptologists and neurophysiologists. The outcomes from the expert consensus opinions promoted consolidation, adaptation, and evolution of existing models that are viable for practice and to be used worldwide. The Delphi consensus demonstrated alignment among regionally located specialists towards the promotion of effective and maintained training for non-epilepsy specialists, as well as highlighting barriers that should be considered and addressed.