MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/08830738251377149

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of child neurology · 2025

Understanding Seizures in Malan Syndrome Through Caregiver Reports: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Dubey Sweta, Hunter Senyene E, Delagrammatikas Christal G, Pinero Gloria, Elumalai Vimala, Zafar Muhammad Shahzad

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Malan syndrome is an ultrarare overgrowth-intellectual disability syndrome caused by NFIX variants, characterized by intellectual disability, postnatal overgrowth, and dysmorphic features. Seizures in Malan syndrome remain poorly understood. We surveyed caregivers of 53 individuals with Malan syndrome. Overall, 55% had seizures or electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities. Seizures occurred in 47%, with 28% experiencing drug-resistant epilepsy. The median age of seizure onset was 3 years. Epilepsy classifications included focal (40%) and unknown-onset tonic-clonic seizures (48%). Generalized tonic-clonic (8%), myoclonic (8%), and epileptic spasms (4%) were also reported. Of those with seizures, 44% had status epilepticus. Valproic acid was the most used antiseizure medication, with variable efficacy. This study represents the largest cohort to date, providing detailed descriptions of seizures in Malan syndrome, and lays a foundation for future research phenotyping epilepsy in affected individuals. Clinicians should maintain a high suspicion of seizures and monitor closely for status epilepticus in individuals with Malan syndrome.

Для цитирования: Dubey Sweta, Hunter Senyene E, Delagrammatikas Christal G, Pinero Gloria, Elumalai Vimala, Zafar Muhammad Shahzad. Understanding Seizures in Malan Syndrome Through Caregiver Reports: A Cross-Sectional Study.. Journal of child neurology. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/08830738251377149.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.