Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique · 2000
[Two years follow-up of a heroin users cohort treated with high dosage buprenorphine. Results of the SPESUB study (pharmacoepidemiologic follow-up of general practice Subutex)].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duburcq A, Charpak Y, Blin P, Madec L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Since February 1996, French GPs are allowed to prescribe high dosage buprenorphine for maintenance treatment of major opioid drug addiction. A prospective cohort of major opioid addicts was initiated in order to assess patient outcomes: follow-up, retention rate in treatment, drug use, intravenous injection and social situation evolution.
METHODS: Each GP, known to be involved in drug user management, had to include the first 10 opioid drug addict patients to whom he prescribed high dosage buprenorphine, with a maximum inclusion period of 3 months. Patients were followed up for two years and a regular standardized information was collected (usual data on drug users and prescription modalities).
RESULTS: Between May and July 1996, 919 patients (664 men and 255 women, mean age: 30 years) were included by 101 GPs. They had a long and serious history of drug addiction, important parallel consumption of cocaine, codeine and other illicit drugs and psychiatric problems (28% of definite problems and 45% of probable) and frequent hepatic conditions (hepatitis B: 23%, hepatitis C: 21%). Two years later, 55% of patients were still followed-up by the same GP and an additional 12% were followed by another GP or in a health care service (hospitalized or receiving methadone in a specialized centre). 13% were not followed, but GPs were able to describe their situation. 8% had been included by GPs who had dropped the study. Finally, 12% of patients were lost to follow-up. Among the 508 patients still followed-up by the same GP after 2 years, the substitution treatment rate was 84%. The dosage bracket had widened (inclusion: mean dosage=7.8 mg +/-4.5, minimum=0.8, maximum=28, median=8; after 2 years: mean=7.6 mg +/-5.4, minimum=0.4, maximum=28, median=8) and the duration of the prescription and dispensing had increased. Declaration of heroin intake in the previous month had fell from 40% to 11% and declaration of drug intake from 53% to 20%. Social situation had improved on average (housing conditions and work). There were 12 seroconversions for hepatitis B, 21 for hepatitis C and 4 for HIV. 14% of patients had declared intravenous injection of high dosage buprenorphine in the previous month.
CONCLUSION: After two years of follow-up, 55% of patients were still followed-up by the same GP and an additional 12% was followed by another GP or in a health care service. Among patients still followed up by the same GP, a reduction of drug related harm (seroconversions for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV) was observed.
METHODS: Each GP, known to be involved in drug user management, had to include the first 10 opioid drug addict patients to whom he prescribed high dosage buprenorphine, with a maximum inclusion period of 3 months. Patients were followed up for two years and a regular standardized information was collected (usual data on drug users and prescription modalities).
RESULTS: Between May and July 1996, 919 patients (664 men and 255 women, mean age: 30 years) were included by 101 GPs. They had a long and serious history of drug addiction, important parallel consumption of cocaine, codeine and other illicit drugs and psychiatric problems (28% of definite problems and 45% of probable) and frequent hepatic conditions (hepatitis B: 23%, hepatitis C: 21%). Two years later, 55% of patients were still followed-up by the same GP and an additional 12% were followed by another GP or in a health care service (hospitalized or receiving methadone in a specialized centre). 13% were not followed, but GPs were able to describe their situation. 8% had been included by GPs who had dropped the study. Finally, 12% of patients were lost to follow-up. Among the 508 patients still followed-up by the same GP after 2 years, the substitution treatment rate was 84%. The dosage bracket had widened (inclusion: mean dosage=7.8 mg +/-4.5, minimum=0.8, maximum=28, median=8; after 2 years: mean=7.6 mg +/-5.4, minimum=0.4, maximum=28, median=8) and the duration of the prescription and dispensing had increased. Declaration of heroin intake in the previous month had fell from 40% to 11% and declaration of drug intake from 53% to 20%. Social situation had improved on average (housing conditions and work). There were 12 seroconversions for hepatitis B, 21 for hepatitis C and 4 for HIV. 14% of patients had declared intravenous injection of high dosage buprenorphine in the previous month.
CONCLUSION: After two years of follow-up, 55% of patients were still followed-up by the same GP and an additional 12% was followed by another GP or in a health care service. Among patients still followed up by the same GP, a reduction of drug related harm (seroconversions for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV) was observed.