MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00383-021-04889-z

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric surgery international · 2021

Magnet ingestion in children and its implications: tertiary centre experience.

Mostafa Mohamed Saber, Darwish Ahmed A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Swallowing multiple magnets or a magnet and second metallic object can carry risks of intestinal obstruction, fistula and perforation because they can attach to each other with loop of bowel in between. An updated management plan and reviewing our experience are warranted because of increased incidence of magnets ingestion among children.

METHODS

All the patients who had a history of single, multiple magnet or single magnet and second metallic object ingestion in Bristol Royal Hospital for children during the period from January 2014 till November 2020 were included in our study.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were referred to our hospital with a history of magnet ingestion. The number of magnets ingested ranged between one and twenty one magnets. All patients had abdominal x-ray undertaken either Antero-posterior alone (AP) (n = 32) or both AP and lateral (n = 14). Surgical intervention was performed in 18 patients; Oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (n = 8), laparotomy/laparoscpy (n = 10) to retrieve the magnets or deal with the complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnets ingestion in children can be tricky when it comes to management. Complications can happen quite often and carry severe risks on children. An updated structured algorithm is proposed to manage children with magnet ingestion.

Для цитирования: Mostafa Mohamed Saber, Darwish Ahmed A. Magnet ingestion in children and its implications: tertiary centre experience.. Pediatric surgery international. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-021-04889-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.