MedElevator
Войти в исследования Allergy · 2014
Propofol administration is safe in adult eosinophilic esophagitis patients sensitized to egg, soy, or peanut.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Molina-Infante J, Arias A, Vara-Brenes D, Prados-Manzano R, Gonzalez-Cervera J, Alvarado-Arenas M, Lucendo A J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sedation might improve tolerability and adherence to endoscopic procedures in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Propofol administration is often contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to egg, soy, or peanut.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of propofol administration for procedural sedation in EoE patients sensitized/allergic to egg, soy, peanut.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study in adult EoE patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy with propofol sedation was conducted between January 2009 and March 2013. Food-specific serum IgE and skin prick tests for egg, soy, peanut, and cross-reactant foods were performed in all patients.
RESULTS: Sixty EoE adult patients, mostly on food elimination diets (91%), were evaluated (age: 28 years (14-56), male gender (90%)). Atopy was present in 88% of patients, being the most prevalent comorbidities rhinoconjunctivitis (78%) and asthma (67%). Fifty-two patients (86%) were sensitized to either egg, soy, or peanut. Eighteen patients (28%) had a history of allergic reactions to egg, legumes, and nuts and strictly avoided these foods. A total of 404 upper endoscopies were performed under propofol sedation. No allergic adverse events were reported, except a transient bronchospasm after orotracheal intubation in an asthmatic adolescent receiving multiple drugs for anesthesia, in whom no sensitization to either propofol or its lipid vehicle was confirmed.
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol was safely administered for procedural sedation in a large series of adult EoE patients multisensitized to egg, soy, peanut, showing one-third clinical allergy to these foods.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of propofol administration for procedural sedation in EoE patients sensitized/allergic to egg, soy, peanut.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study in adult EoE patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy with propofol sedation was conducted between January 2009 and March 2013. Food-specific serum IgE and skin prick tests for egg, soy, peanut, and cross-reactant foods were performed in all patients.
RESULTS: Sixty EoE adult patients, mostly on food elimination diets (91%), were evaluated (age: 28 years (14-56), male gender (90%)). Atopy was present in 88% of patients, being the most prevalent comorbidities rhinoconjunctivitis (78%) and asthma (67%). Fifty-two patients (86%) were sensitized to either egg, soy, or peanut. Eighteen patients (28%) had a history of allergic reactions to egg, legumes, and nuts and strictly avoided these foods. A total of 404 upper endoscopies were performed under propofol sedation. No allergic adverse events were reported, except a transient bronchospasm after orotracheal intubation in an asthmatic adolescent receiving multiple drugs for anesthesia, in whom no sensitization to either propofol or its lipid vehicle was confirmed.
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol was safely administered for procedural sedation in a large series of adult EoE patients multisensitized to egg, soy, peanut, showing one-third clinical allergy to these foods.