Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2011
Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy in children with defecation disorders (with video).
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяVideo-Audio MediaНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodriguez Leonel, Flores Alejandro, Gilchrist Brian F, Goldstein Allan M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedure has been widely used in the management of children with defecation disorders. The ACE procedure has undergone many technical modifications. We developed a safe and minimally invasive technique, the laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy (LAPEC).
OBJECTIVE: To compare LAPEC to laparoscopic cecostomy in terms of operative time, hospital length of stay, and procedure-related morbidity.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of children undergoing the ACE procedure.
SETTING: Two tertiary-care centers.
PATIENTS: This study involved children with defecation disorders.
INTERVENTION: The ACE procedure.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Procedure complications, length of stay, and operative time.
RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent LAPEC, and 15 underwent laparoscopic cecostomy. Of the LAPEC patients, 70% were male, with mean age 12 ± 4.2 years, mean operative time 100.1 ± 16.6 minutes, and mean length of stay 3.4 ± 1.4 days. Of the laparoscopic cecostomy patients, 56% were male, with mean age 10.5 ± 4 years, mean operative time 100.8 ± 19.1 minutes, and mean length of stay 3.8 ± 1.6 days. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups. The single intraoperative complication during LAPEC was a cecal hematoma. Postoperative complications after LAPEC included 6 patients with low-grade fever, 3 patients with tube dislodgement (2 treated by repeat LAPEC and the other by open surgery), and 2 patients with skin breakdown. Of the 50 LAPEC patients and their families, 48 were satisfied with the outcome.
LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study.
CONCLUSION: LAPEC is a safe, minimally invasive procedure for cecostomy placement in children with refractory constipation or fecal incontinence.
OBJECTIVE: To compare LAPEC to laparoscopic cecostomy in terms of operative time, hospital length of stay, and procedure-related morbidity.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of children undergoing the ACE procedure.
SETTING: Two tertiary-care centers.
PATIENTS: This study involved children with defecation disorders.
INTERVENTION: The ACE procedure.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Procedure complications, length of stay, and operative time.
RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent LAPEC, and 15 underwent laparoscopic cecostomy. Of the LAPEC patients, 70% were male, with mean age 12 ± 4.2 years, mean operative time 100.1 ± 16.6 minutes, and mean length of stay 3.4 ± 1.4 days. Of the laparoscopic cecostomy patients, 56% were male, with mean age 10.5 ± 4 years, mean operative time 100.8 ± 19.1 minutes, and mean length of stay 3.8 ± 1.6 days. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups. The single intraoperative complication during LAPEC was a cecal hematoma. Postoperative complications after LAPEC included 6 patients with low-grade fever, 3 patients with tube dislodgement (2 treated by repeat LAPEC and the other by open surgery), and 2 patients with skin breakdown. Of the 50 LAPEC patients and their families, 48 were satisfied with the outcome.
LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study.
CONCLUSION: LAPEC is a safe, minimally invasive procedure for cecostomy placement in children with refractory constipation or fecal incontinence.