American journal of ophthalmology · 2022
Risk Factors for Glaucoma Drainage Device Exposure in Children: A Case-Control Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jomar Deema E, Al-Shahwan Sami, Al-Beishri Ali S, Freidi Alia, Malik Rizwan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors for glaucoma drainage device (GDD) exposure in children.
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
METHODS: The study population comprised children (one eye each) who presented with a history of GDD exposure to a tertiary care eye hospital over the period January 2014 to January 2020. Consecutive children (age <18 years) were included. A control group from the same time period (children without GDD exposure) were included in the ratio of 5 controls to every 1 case of exposure. The main outcome measures included risk factors for exposure (univariate and multivariate analysis).
RESULTS: A total of 21 eyes (of 21 children with implant exposure) and 115 eyes (of 115 children without exposure) were included in this study. During the same study period, a total of 494 eyes had undergone GDD implantation, giving an estimated incidence of exposure of 4.25%). In the bivariate analysis, GDD exposure was associated with multiple previous ocular surgeries (P = .001), longer follow-up duration (P < .001), combined procedure at the time of primary implantation (P = .002), and a younger age at the time of primary implantation (P = .006). The former 3 risk factors continued to prove a statistically significant association on multivariable regression analysis. Postoperative use of eye lubricants was more common among children in the control group (P = .007).
CONCLUSION: In pediatric glaucoma patients, younger age and combined procedure at the time of primary GDD implantation, in addition to multiple previous ocular surgeries, were associated with greater risk of implant exposure. Postoperative use of eye lubricants may be protective.
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
METHODS: The study population comprised children (one eye each) who presented with a history of GDD exposure to a tertiary care eye hospital over the period January 2014 to January 2020. Consecutive children (age <18 years) were included. A control group from the same time period (children without GDD exposure) were included in the ratio of 5 controls to every 1 case of exposure. The main outcome measures included risk factors for exposure (univariate and multivariate analysis).
RESULTS: A total of 21 eyes (of 21 children with implant exposure) and 115 eyes (of 115 children without exposure) were included in this study. During the same study period, a total of 494 eyes had undergone GDD implantation, giving an estimated incidence of exposure of 4.25%). In the bivariate analysis, GDD exposure was associated with multiple previous ocular surgeries (P = .001), longer follow-up duration (P < .001), combined procedure at the time of primary implantation (P = .002), and a younger age at the time of primary implantation (P = .006). The former 3 risk factors continued to prove a statistically significant association on multivariable regression analysis. Postoperative use of eye lubricants was more common among children in the control group (P = .007).
CONCLUSION: In pediatric glaucoma patients, younger age and combined procedure at the time of primary GDD implantation, in addition to multiple previous ocular surgeries, were associated with greater risk of implant exposure. Postoperative use of eye lubricants may be protective.