MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jdsade/enae043

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2024

A comparative study of how teachers communicate in deaf education classrooms.

Holcomb Leala, Dostal Hannah, Wolbers Kimberly

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study investigates the communication practices of four teachers in 3rd to 6th grade classrooms with 9 deaf students with limited language proficiency and in stages of emergent writing development. Analyzing language modalities, utterance types, and class interactivity, we found that teachers using American sign language used student-centered approaches, generating a greater number of directives and responsive utterances. They persevered in increasing students' engagement and were successful in clarifying misunderstandings. Teachers using spoken English used teacher-centered approaches, making general comments directed at the whole class, which consequently reduced student participation and responsiveness. They also largely avoided repairing communication breakdowns with emergent writers, focusing instead on those with greater auditory and speaking abilities. These patterns reveal disparities in classroom communication that can affect student learning. Our findings highlight the need for teacher preparation programs to equip teachers with skill sets to employ accessible and effective communication during instruction, especially with deaf students who are still developing foundational language and writing skills.

Для цитирования: Holcomb Leala, Dostal Hannah, Wolbers Kimberly. A comparative study of how teachers communicate in deaf education classrooms.. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/jdsade/enae043.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.