MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0378-6323.16783

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology · 2005

Occupational contact dermatitis among the traditional 'tie and dye' cottage industry in Western Rajasthan.

Singhi M K, Menghani P R, Gupta L K, Kachhawa Dilip, Bansal Mohit

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Dyeing is an age-old process and forms an integral part of textile industries. Tying is a process by which a particular part of cloth is prevented from the process of dyeing. The skin diseases in workers engaged in the 'tie and dye' industry have not been extensively studied.

AIMS: To study the prevalence of contact dermatitis among workers engaged in the 'tie and dye' industries in and around Jodhpur (Western Rajasthan).

METHODS

One thousand three hundred workers engaged in 'tie and dye' work were evaluated for occupation-related dermatitis. Those with skin lesions were subjected to patch tests using 2% aqueous solution of the dyes and chemicals commonly used by them. These included direct dyes, VAT dyes, sulfur dyes and azo dyes. Fifty workers without skin lesions served as controls.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (7.69%) had dermatitis involving the exposed sites, mainly the hands and forearms. Eighty-one patients showed positive reactions to one or more dyes, most commonly Red RC base (azo dye), followed by naphthol.

CONCLUSION

Red RC base and naphthol were the commonest allergens in the 'tie and dye' industry.

Для цитирования: Singhi M K, Menghani P R, Gupta L K, Kachhawa Dilip, Bansal Mohit. Occupational contact dermatitis among the traditional 'tie and dye' cottage industry in Western Rajasthan.. Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology. 2005. DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.16783.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.