MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/neuonc/now301

Медицинская библиотека · Neuro-oncology · 2017

The radiosurgery fractionation quandary: single fraction or hypofractionation?

Kirkpatrick John P, Soltys Scott G, Lo Simon S, Beal Kathryn, Shrieve Dennis C, Brown Paul D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), typically administered in a single session, is widely employed to safely, efficiently, and effectively treat small intracranial lesions. However, for large lesions or those in close proximity to critical structures, it can be difficult to obtain an acceptable balance of tumor control while avoiding damage to normal tissue when single-fraction SRS is utilized. Treating a lesion in 2 to 5 fractions of SRS (termed "hypofractionated SRS" [HF-SRS]) potentially provides the ability to treat a lesion with a total dose of radiation that provides both adequate tumor control and acceptable toxicity. Indeed, studies of HF-SRS in large brain metastases, vestibular schwannomas, meningiomas, and gliomas suggest that a superior balance of tumor control and toxicity is observed compared with single-fraction SRS. Nonetheless, a great deal of effort remains to understand radiobiologic mechanisms for HF-SRS driving the dose-volume response relationship for tumors and normal tissues and to utilize this fundamental knowledge and the results of clinic studies to optimize HF-SRS. In particular, the application of HF-SRS in the setting of immunomodulatory cancer therapies offers special challenges and opportunities.

Для цитирования: Kirkpatrick John P, Soltys Scott G, Lo Simon S, Beal Kathryn, Shrieve Dennis C, Brown Paul D. The radiosurgery fractionation quandary: single fraction or hypofractionation?. Neuro-oncology. 2017. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now301.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.