MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/alr.23312

Медицинская библиотека · International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2023

Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in people with cystic fibrosis and factors associated with improvement after highly effective modulator therapy.

Miller Jessa E, Taylor-Cousar Jennifer L, Overdevest Jonathan B, Khatiwada Aastha, Mace Jess C, Alt Jeremiah A, Bodner Todd E, Chowdhury Naweed I, DiMango Emily A, Eshaghian Patricia H, Getz Anne E, Gudis David A, Han Ethan J, Hwang Peter H, Keating Claire L, Khanwalkar Ashoke, Kimple Adam J, Lee Jivianne T, Li Douglas, Markarian Karolin, Norris Meghan, Nayak Jayakar V, Owens Cameran, Patel Zara M, Poch Katie, Schlosser Rodney J, Smith Kristine A, Smith Timothy L, Soler Zachary M, Suh Jeffrey D, Tervo Jeremy P, Turner Grant A, Wang Marilene B, Saavedra Milene T, Beswick Daniel M

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common among people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) is a validated instrument that evaluates olfactory-specific quality-of-life. The QOD minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and factors associated with olfactory improvement after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor have not been determined for PwCF.

METHODS

Prospective observational data were pooled from three studies that enrolled adult PwCF with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). QOD scores and disease characteristics were assessed. To evaluate internal consistency and calculate the QOD MCID, Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were employed. For participants who enrolled prior to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD scores were obtained at baseline and after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor initiation. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with QOD improvement.

RESULTS

Of 129 PwCF included, 65 had QOD scores before and 3-6 months after starting elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Mean baseline QOD score was 6.5 ± 7.9. Mean Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.85. The MCID estimates were as follows: Cohen's effect size = 1.6, standard error of measurement = 2.5, ½ baseline standard deviation = 4.0, and minimal detectable change = 6.9. Mean MCID was 3.7. Of those with pre/post elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor QOD scores, the mean change in QOD was -1.3 ± 5.4. After elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD improvement surpassed the MCID in 22% of participants (14/65). Worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps were associated with improved QOD scores after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (both p < 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The QOD MCID in PwCF was estimated to be 3.7. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor led to qualitative but not clinically meaningful improvements in QOD score for most PwCF; PwCF with worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps improved in a clinically significant manner.

Для цитирования: Miller Jessa E, Taylor-Cousar Jennifer L, Overdevest Jonathan B, Khatiwada Aastha, Mace Jess C, Alt Jeremiah A, Bodner Todd E, Chowdhury Naweed I, DiMango Emily A, Eshaghian Patricia H, Getz Anne E, Gudis David A, Han Ethan J, Hwang Peter H, Keating Claire L, Khanwalkar Ashoke, Kimple Adam J, Lee Jivianne T, Li Douglas, Markarian Karolin, Norris Meghan, Nayak Jayakar V, Owens Cameran, Patel Zara M, Poch Katie, Schlosser Rodney J, Smith Kristine A, Smith Timothy L, Soler Zachary M, Suh Jeffrey D, Tervo Jeremy P, Turner Grant A, Wang Marilene B, Saavedra Milene T, Beswick Daniel M. Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in people with cystic fibrosis and factors associated with improvement after highly effective modulator therapy.. International forum of allergy & rhinology. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/alr.23312.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.