MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Tokai journal of experimental and clinical medicine · 2004

A case report: spontaneous rupture of dissecting aneurysm of the middle colic artery.

Chino Osamu, Kijima Hiroshi, Shibuya Makoto, Yamamoto Soichiro, Kashiwagi Hiroyuki, Kondo Yasumasa, Makuuchi Hiroyasu

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Aneurysms of the superior mesenteric artery branches are rarely reported, even among them colic artery aneurysms are seldom. We report a case of 78-year-old male with ruptured dissecting aneurysm of middle colic artery. The patient complained abdominal pain and nausea during hospital stay for renal stone. The patient suddenly developed severe abdominal pain, leading to shock. He underwent emergency surgery under a preoperative diagnosis of intraperitoneal hemorrhage. At exploratory laparotomy, a large hematoma involving the mesentery root of the transverse colon was associated with a ruptured aneurysm measuring 15 x 10 mm in size, which was located to the mid-portion of middle colic artery. Right-hemicolectomy was carried out because of ischemic changes in the ascending colon. Histological examination demonstrated a ruptured dissecting aneurysm of the middle colic artery approximately 5 cm in length, associated with destruction of the tunica interna and media. The aneurysm was thought to result from idiopathic segmental arterial mediolysis, because no definitive evidence of atherosclerosis or arteritis was observed.

Для цитирования: Chino Osamu, Kijima Hiroshi, Shibuya Makoto, Yamamoto Soichiro, Kashiwagi Hiroyuki, Kondo Yasumasa, Makuuchi Hiroyasu. A case report: spontaneous rupture of dissecting aneurysm of the middle colic artery.. The Tokai journal of experimental and clinical medicine. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.