MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41433-018-0132-1

Медицинская библиотека · Eye (London, England) · 2018

Clinical experience on diagnosis and treatment for malignancy originating from the dacryocyst.

Zhu Li-Juan, Zhu Yu, Hao Shang-Chen, Huang Pei, Wang Lin-Lin, Li Xiu-Hong, Lian Li-Hong, Zhang Ke

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To summarize clinical experience on the diagnosis and treatment for malignancy originating from the dacryocyst.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological data from 12 cases that were diagnosed with malignancy originating from the dacryocyst by histopathological examination in our hospital from 2007 to 2017.

RESULTS

Of the 12 cases with malignancy originating from the dacryocyst, 7 were male and 5 were female, with a mean age of 53 years (range, 4-81). Clinical manifestations included a mass in the dacryocyst area in 12 cases, epiphora in 9 cases, pyoid tears in 2 cases, bloody tears in 3 cases, and redness and swelling in the dacryocyst area in 2 cases. Lymphoma occurred in six cases, malignant melanoma in three cases, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma in one case, and squamous cell carcinoma in two cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis readily occur for malignancy originating from the dacryocyst because its clinical manifestations are diverse. For the suspected patients, it is necessary to perform related examinations. Individualized treatment should be adopted based on pathological types and specific conditions.

Для цитирования: Zhu Li-Juan, Zhu Yu, Hao Shang-Chen, Huang Pei, Wang Lin-Lin, Li Xiu-Hong, Lian Li-Hong, Zhang Ke. Clinical experience on diagnosis and treatment for malignancy originating from the dacryocyst.. Eye (London, England). 2018. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0132-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.