DOI 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.04.002
Strabismus in Children With Intellectual Disability: Part of a Broader Motor Control Phenotype?
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Intellectual disability (ID) results from a heterogeneous group of disorders and affects 1% to 2% of children. ID frequently occurs in association with other clinical features such as seizures or malformations. We suspected that strabismus might also be unusually frequent in this population and that it might be associated with ID groups affecting motor control.
METHODS
We reviewed phenotypic descriptors, extracted from medical records, for a heterogeneous series of 222 probands with ID who had been enrolled in a study of clinical application of exome sequencing. We estimated the frequency of strabismus and other common clinical features and explored statistical associations between them. Data from Population Data British Columbia and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man were also examined for confirmation of our observations.
RESULTS
Strabismus had a higher prevalence among probands with ID than in the general population (odds ratio = 5.46). Moreover, probands with both ID and strabismus were more likely to have problems affecting motor control than those with ID and no strabismus (odds ratio = 2.84). Hypotonia was one of the most common motor control subgroups affecting the ID probands, and a frequent co-occurrence of strabismus and hypotonia was also observed (odds ratio = 2.51) and supported by related gene literature review. There was no evidence for associations between strabismus and other frequent clinical features.
CONCLUSION
Strabismus is a frequent feature in individuals with ID. The frequent co-occurrence of strabismus and motor control phenotypes, in particular hypotonia, suggests that a common cerebellar mechanism or pathway may underlie these phenotypes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.