MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anai.2022.07.033

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2022

Participant characteristics and safety outcomes of peanut oral immunotherapy in the RAMSES and ARC011 trials.

Ciaccio Christina, Goldsobel Alan B, Anagnostou Aikaterini, Beyer Kirsten, Casale Thomas B, Deschildre Antoine, Fernández-Rivas Montserrat, Hourihane Jonathan O'B, Krawiec Marta, Lieberman Jay, Scurlock Amy M, Vickery Brian P, Smith Alex, Tilles Stephen A, Adelman Daniel C, Brown Kari R, RAMSES (ARC007) and ARC011 Study Groups:

Рандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials (PALISADE [ARC003], ARTEMIS [ARC010]) proving efficacy and safety of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH) have used double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) to screen for eligibility and to evaluate efficacy. In routine clinical practice, individuals with peanut allergy do not always undergo food challenges to confirm diagnosis or determine candidacy for treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To describe PTAH safety and tolerability in participants selected by clinical history and peanut sensitization parameters not undergoing DBPCFCs during trials and to compare findings with previously published data.

METHODS

RAMSES (ARC007) was a 6-month, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in children aged 4 to 17 years with physician-confirmed peanut allergy. ARC011 was the subsequent 6-month follow-on maintenance PTAH study. The primary end point for RAMSES and ARC011 was the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). We descriptively compared baseline characteristics and safety outcomes from RAMSES and ARC011 to participants undergoing DBPCFCs in phase 3 PALISADE and ARTEMIS trials.

RESULTS

In 506 patients randomized to study treatment, baseline characteristics appeared balanced among groups. Proportion of participants with at least 1 AE was 55% for PTAH vs 33.9% for placebo during initial dose escalation and 98.8% vs 94.0% during updosing, respectively. Most participants with AEs had mild or moderate events. The most common AEs were gastrointestinal. Comparisons to pooled PALISADE and ARTEMIS data revealed higher baseline median peanut-specific immunoglobulin E and skin prick test values for RAMSES participants. Safety outcomes during trial periods were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Safety data from clinically selected children with peanut allergy receiving PTAH do not seem different from those in phase 3 trials requiring DBPCFC to enter trials.

Для цитирования: Ciaccio Christina, Goldsobel Alan B, Anagnostou Aikaterini, Beyer Kirsten, Casale Thomas B, Deschildre Antoine, Fernández-Rivas Montserrat, Hourihane Jonathan O'B, Krawiec Marta, Lieberman Jay, Scurlock Amy M, Vickery Brian P, Smith Alex, Tilles Stephen A, Adelman Daniel C, Brown Kari R, RAMSES (ARC007) and ARC011 Study Groups:. Participant characteristics and safety outcomes of peanut oral immunotherapy in the RAMSES and ARC011 trials.. Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.07.033.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.