MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-0031-1297165

Медицинская библиотека · Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis · 2011

Childhood immune thrombocytopenia: a changing therapeutic landscape.

Breakey Vicky R, Blanchette Victor S

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Childhood immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is generally a benign self-limiting disorder of young children with <10% of cases requiring regular platelet enhancing therapy at 1 year following diagnosis. Increasingly, children with newly diagnosed ITP, who have isolated thrombocytopenia and no atypical features in the history or physical examination, are managed with minimal investigation and observation alone. The role of up-front, short-course corticosteroid therapy without bone marrow aspiration in this subgroup of cases merits further investigation. For children with clinically significant chronic ITP, the timing of elective splenectomy and the role of splenectomy-sparing strategies such as rituximab continues to be debated. Management of children with combined autoimmune cytopenias secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus, common variable immunodeficiency, and the autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome is often a challenge. Splenectomy should be avoided in cases with documented immunodeficiencies because of the increased risk of overwhelming sepsis postsplenectomy. For these cases, as well as for children with resistant primary chronic ITP who have failed splenectomy, the role of therapies such as mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, and the thrombopoietins remains to be determined.

Для цитирования: Breakey Vicky R, Blanchette Victor S. Childhood immune thrombocytopenia: a changing therapeutic landscape.. Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis. 2011. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1297165.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.