MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160270091029

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of diseases of children (1960) · 1993

Survival of profoundly disabled people with severe mental retardation.

Eyman R K, Grossman H J, Chaney R H, Call T L

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To define further the association between survival and clinical disabilities in profoundly disabled people with mental retardation in an 11-year period.

RESEARCH

DESIGN

An 11-year follow-up study of the survival of six mutually exclusive subgroups. The presence of severe, profound, or suspected mental retardation and incontinence were considered in all individuals when forming the subgroups. Varying combinations of abilities in mobility, rolling, feeding, and arm-hand use were also considered.

PARTICIPANTS

Six subgroups of severely disabled subjects. Included were 128,248 of 155,851 persons who received services from the California Department of Developmental Services between January 1980 and March 1991.

MEASUREMENTS/MAIN

RESULTS

Survival estimates for individuals who were immobile and could not roll over were short regardless of arm-hand use or feeding status, as were estimates for people who were tube fed. For individuals who could roll over, but were otherwise immobile, survival was relatively improved.

CONCLUSION

Individuals who are unable to move their extremities or bodies voluntarily or who require tube feeding have very shortened life expectancies.

Для цитирования: Eyman R K, Grossman H J, Chaney R H, Call T L. Survival of profoundly disabled people with severe mental retardation.. American journal of diseases of children (1960). 1993. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160270091029.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.