Biological psychiatry · 2025
Brain Responses During Face Processing in Conduct Disorder: Considering Sex and Callous-Unemotional Traits.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De Brito Stephane A, Rogers Jack C, Pauli Ruth, Kohls Gregor, Raschle Nora M, Martinelli Anne, Smaragdi Areti, Gonzalez-Madruga Karen, Cornwell Harriet, Stadler Christina, Konrad Kerstin, Freitag Christine M, Fairchild Graeme
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of conduct disorder (CD) have mostly been limited to males. Here, we examined whether male and female youths with CD showed similar or distinct alterations in brain responses to emotional faces, using a large sample of male and female youths with CD. We also investigated the influence of callous-unemotional (CU) traits.
METHODS: Brain responses to angry, fearful, and neutral faces were assessed in 161 youths with CD (74 female) and 241 typically developing (TD) youths (139 female) ages 9 to 18 years. Categorical analyses tested for diagnosis effects (CD vs. TD and CD with high levels of CU traits [CD/HCU] vs. low levels of CU traits [CD/LCU] vs. TD) and sex × diagnosis interactions.
RESULTS: When processing faces in general (all faces vs. baseline), youths with CD exhibited lower amygdala responses compared with TD youths, which seemed to be driven by the CD/HCU subgroup. Sex × CU subgroup interactions were identified in the amygdala (CD/LCU females < TD females; CD/LCU males > TD males) and anterior insula (CD/HCU females > CD/LCU females; CD/HCU males < CD/LCU males).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings for males support an influential neurocognitive model of CD. However, the association between CU traits and brain response to facial expressions differed in females and males with CD, suggesting distinct pathophysiological processes.
METHODS: Brain responses to angry, fearful, and neutral faces were assessed in 161 youths with CD (74 female) and 241 typically developing (TD) youths (139 female) ages 9 to 18 years. Categorical analyses tested for diagnosis effects (CD vs. TD and CD with high levels of CU traits [CD/HCU] vs. low levels of CU traits [CD/LCU] vs. TD) and sex × diagnosis interactions.
RESULTS: When processing faces in general (all faces vs. baseline), youths with CD exhibited lower amygdala responses compared with TD youths, which seemed to be driven by the CD/HCU subgroup. Sex × CU subgroup interactions were identified in the amygdala (CD/LCU females < TD females; CD/LCU males > TD males) and anterior insula (CD/HCU females > CD/LCU females; CD/HCU males < CD/LCU males).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings for males support an influential neurocognitive model of CD. However, the association between CU traits and brain response to facial expressions differed in females and males with CD, suggesting distinct pathophysiological processes.