Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2025
Remote work and mental health among employed US adults.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leong Weng In, Wei Lijing, Goodman Melody S, Pagán José A, Cuevas Adolfo G, Bather Jemar R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Existing research presents mixed findings regarding the effect of remote work on mental health, suggesting both beneficial and adverse outcomes.
AIMS: To quantify the association between remote work status and depression/anxiety risk among employed US adults.
METHODS: Repeated cross-sectional data (September 2022 to October 2023) from the Household Pulse Survey, a nationally representative sample of US adults. Depression risk (Cronbach's α 0.74) was measured using Patient Health Questionnaire-2, and anxiety risk (Cronbach's α 0.82) was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2. Weighted logistic regression models estimated covariate-adjusted associations between remote work status (0, 1-2, 3-4, 5+ days) and depression and anxiety risk. Covariates included race/ethnicity, gender identity, marital status, age, educational attainment, household income, number of children, employment sector, region, and survey cycle.
RESULTS: Individuals who worked remotely for 1 to 2 days or 3 to 4 days per week (both adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) had slightly lower odds of depression risk than those who did not work remotely. Conversely, individuals who worked remotely for 5 or more days per week (aOR: 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04) had slightly higher odds of anxiety risk compared to nonremote workers after controlling for the same covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: Remote work status may be a social determinant of mental health. Our findings suggested that hybrid work may be a healthful working style. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish temporal relationships and potential causality between remote work arrangements and mental health risks.
AIMS: To quantify the association between remote work status and depression/anxiety risk among employed US adults.
METHODS: Repeated cross-sectional data (September 2022 to October 2023) from the Household Pulse Survey, a nationally representative sample of US adults. Depression risk (Cronbach's α 0.74) was measured using Patient Health Questionnaire-2, and anxiety risk (Cronbach's α 0.82) was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2. Weighted logistic regression models estimated covariate-adjusted associations between remote work status (0, 1-2, 3-4, 5+ days) and depression and anxiety risk. Covariates included race/ethnicity, gender identity, marital status, age, educational attainment, household income, number of children, employment sector, region, and survey cycle.
RESULTS: Individuals who worked remotely for 1 to 2 days or 3 to 4 days per week (both adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) had slightly lower odds of depression risk than those who did not work remotely. Conversely, individuals who worked remotely for 5 or more days per week (aOR: 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04) had slightly higher odds of anxiety risk compared to nonremote workers after controlling for the same covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: Remote work status may be a social determinant of mental health. Our findings suggested that hybrid work may be a healthful working style. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish temporal relationships and potential causality between remote work arrangements and mental health risks.