The British journal of ophthalmology · 2008
Plusoptix Vision Screener: the accuracy and repeatability of refractive measurements using a new autorefractor.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dahlmann-Noor A H, Comyn O, Kostakis V, Misra A, Gupta N, Heath J, Brown J, Iron A, McGill S, Vrotsou K, Vivian A J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Plusoptix Vision Screener (PVS) is a new non-cycloplegic videoretinoscopy autorefractor. Refractive accuracy may affect its performance as a screening tool.
AIMS: Study 1: To determine the intra- and interobserver variability of PVS measurements. Study 2: To compare PVS measurements with gold-standard manual cycloplegic retinoscopy (MCR).
METHODS: Study 1: PVS refraction of 103 children with mean (SD) age 5.5 (0.6) years by two observers. Study 2: PVS and MCR refraction of 126 children with mean (SD) age 5.5 (1.5) years, including 43 children with manifest strabismus >/=5 PD, comparing mean spherical equivalent (MSE) and Jackson cross cylinders J(0) and J(45).
RESULTS: Study 1: Repeatability coefficients (observer 1): MSE: 0.63 D, J(0): 0.24 D, J(45): 0.18 D; those of observer 2 were nearly identical. The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between the two observers for MSE, J(0) and J(45) were, respectively, 0.03 (-0.62 to 0.68 D), -0.008 (-0.25 to 0.23 D) and 0.013 (-0.18 to 0.20) D. Study 2: MSE tended to be lower on PVS than MCR, with differences of up to 8.00 D. Less than 20% of values were within +/-0.50 D of each other. Agreement was better for J(0) and J(45). Strabismus was associated with an odds ratio of 3.7 (95% CI 1.3 to 10.5) of the PVS failing to obtain a reading.
CONCLUSIONS: The PVS may underestimate children's refractive error.
AIMS: Study 1: To determine the intra- and interobserver variability of PVS measurements. Study 2: To compare PVS measurements with gold-standard manual cycloplegic retinoscopy (MCR).
METHODS: Study 1: PVS refraction of 103 children with mean (SD) age 5.5 (0.6) years by two observers. Study 2: PVS and MCR refraction of 126 children with mean (SD) age 5.5 (1.5) years, including 43 children with manifest strabismus >/=5 PD, comparing mean spherical equivalent (MSE) and Jackson cross cylinders J(0) and J(45).
RESULTS: Study 1: Repeatability coefficients (observer 1): MSE: 0.63 D, J(0): 0.24 D, J(45): 0.18 D; those of observer 2 were nearly identical. The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between the two observers for MSE, J(0) and J(45) were, respectively, 0.03 (-0.62 to 0.68 D), -0.008 (-0.25 to 0.23 D) and 0.013 (-0.18 to 0.20) D. Study 2: MSE tended to be lower on PVS than MCR, with differences of up to 8.00 D. Less than 20% of values were within +/-0.50 D of each other. Agreement was better for J(0) and J(45). Strabismus was associated with an odds ratio of 3.7 (95% CI 1.3 to 10.5) of the PVS failing to obtain a reading.
CONCLUSIONS: The PVS may underestimate children's refractive error.