DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105448
Stakeholder perspectives on contextual barriers to the successful implementation of multiple family group therapy in the Lower Manya Krobo District, Ghana: a qualitative study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to examine the contextual barriers that may hinder the implementation of multiple family group therapy (MFGT) in Ghana's Lower Manya Krobo District.
DESIGN
An exploratory, descriptive, qualitative study employing focus group discussions and in-depth interviews.
SETTING
Atua Government Hospital in the Lower Manya Krobo District. Data were collected between February and March 2025.
PARTICIPANTS
12 young people living with HIV (YPLHIV; aged 12-22 years), 13 caregivers and five healthcare professionals were selected via purposive sampling.
RESULTS
Four major themes emerged: (1) resource and logistic constraints, including transportation challenges, programme sustainability concerns and inadequate physical facilities; (2) stigma and confidentiality concerns, encompassing public identification fears and community stigma; (3) implementation challenges, involving attendance reliability and organisational instability; and (4) participation barriers, including group setting anxiety and delayed HIV status disclosure. These barriers spanned multiple domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), highlighting the complex, multi-level nature of implementation challenges.
CONCLUSION
Successful implementation of MFGT for YPLHIV in Ghana requires addressing interrelated barriers across multiple ecological levels simultaneously. These findings largely underscore the importance of exploring the local context for potential barriers to inform the adaptation of evidence-based interventions to accommodate ecological concerns.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06701942.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.