MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/13668250.2025.2564063

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2025

Predictors of popularity among students with intellectual disabilities: The role of prosocial and antisocial behaviours.

Schoop-Kasteler Noemi, Hofmann Verena, Cillessen Antonius H N, Müller Christoph M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Little attention has been given to the relationship between popularity and social behaviour among students with intellectual disabilities in special needs schools. Based on resource control theory and findings among typically developing students, we expected popularity predictors to include both prosocial and antisocial behaviours.

METHOD: School staff (n = 397) reported on popularity, prosocial, and antisocial behaviours of 1,125 students (Mage = 11.26 years, SD = 3.76; 69% boys) with intellectual disabilities in Swiss special needs schools.

RESULTS

Multilevel analyses showed that students with higher prosocial and antisocial behaviours at the start of the school year were more likely to be popular by the end, even after accounting for gender, age, adaptive behaviour, and initial popularity. The effect of antisocial behaviour on popularity was stronger for boys.

CONCLUSION

Findings support the universality of the relationship between prosocial and antisocial behaviours with popularity. Implications for students with intellectual disabilities are discussed.

Для цитирования: Schoop-Kasteler Noemi, Hofmann Verena, Cillessen Antonius H N, Müller Christoph M. Predictors of popularity among students with intellectual disabilities: The role of prosocial and antisocial behaviours.. Journal of intellectual & developmental disability. 2025. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2025.2564063.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.