Pediatric emergency care · 2021
Metoclopramide-Induced Acute Dystonia: Data From a Pediatric Emergency Unit.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yarar Coskun, Yakut Ayten, Carman Kursat Bora, Sahin Sabiha, Kocak Ozan, Ozkan Serhat, Bal Cengiz
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Metoclopramide is a commonly used medication in pediatric practice, and dystonia is a common adverse effect of it. The present study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics of metoclopramide-induced acute dystonic reactions (MIADRs) in pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric emergency unit.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were admitted with MIADRs between June 2004 and April 2016; they were enrolled into the study retrospectively.
RESULTS: The study group was composed of 13 females and 15 males with the mean ± SD age of the females higher than that of the males, 12.3 ± 4.5 and 7.8 ± 4.3 years, respectively. Only 9 (32.1%) of the patients were diagnosed as MIADRs at the time of admission. Seventeen patients (60.7%) received over the recommended daily dose of metoclopramide. Dystonia was focal in most of the patients, with the most affected parts consisting of the neck, eyes, and orolingual regions. In 9 of the patients, the dystonia was episodic in nature. Pharmacological treatment was used for 18 patients. No patients died, and none suffered long-term injury related to MIADRs.
CONCLUSIONS: Metoclopramide administration may be associated with the occurrence of acute dystonic reaction. Metoclopramide-induced acute dystonic reactions may be misdiagnosed, so detailed medical history gathering and a high index of suspicion are warranted. Our data suggest that MIADRs may be dose related and that there may be age- and sex-related differences in the epidemiology of MIADRs.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were admitted with MIADRs between June 2004 and April 2016; they were enrolled into the study retrospectively.
RESULTS: The study group was composed of 13 females and 15 males with the mean ± SD age of the females higher than that of the males, 12.3 ± 4.5 and 7.8 ± 4.3 years, respectively. Only 9 (32.1%) of the patients were diagnosed as MIADRs at the time of admission. Seventeen patients (60.7%) received over the recommended daily dose of metoclopramide. Dystonia was focal in most of the patients, with the most affected parts consisting of the neck, eyes, and orolingual regions. In 9 of the patients, the dystonia was episodic in nature. Pharmacological treatment was used for 18 patients. No patients died, and none suffered long-term injury related to MIADRs.
CONCLUSIONS: Metoclopramide administration may be associated with the occurrence of acute dystonic reaction. Metoclopramide-induced acute dystonic reactions may be misdiagnosed, so detailed medical history gathering and a high index of suspicion are warranted. Our data suggest that MIADRs may be dose related and that there may be age- and sex-related differences in the epidemiology of MIADRs.