Cochlear implantation in patients with ossified cochleas.

PURPOSE: The timing of CI for postmeningitic deafness is controversial and differential outcomes have been reported. To review and share our surgical and auditory outcomes.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

17 patients with ossified cochleas who received CI were enrolled. Clinical data including the cause of cochlear ossification, preoperative examination, onset of deafness, age at implantation, surgical findings, and relevant auditory outcomes was analysed.

RESULTS

Cochlear ossification was observed in 53% of patients with HRCT, whereas the corresponding value for MRI was 59%. Patients in both stage I and II received complete insertion of the electrode array, however, stage III patients only received partial insertion. 1 patient in stage II received bilateral CI. Hearing tests showed increased average hearing threshold for stage III patients than those in stage I and II (P < 0.05). CAP scores were much lower for stage III patients than those in stage I and II (P < 0.05). Postlingual deafness patients showed higher SIR scores than prelingual deafness children (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HRCT and MRI have comparable value in predicting the occurrence of ossification in cochleas. We recommend fast surgical intervention in the patients with bilateral profound postmeningitic deafness. If possible, bilateral cochlear implantation is recommended.