Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
Methylation and gene expression patterns in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma highlight a panel of genes associated with disease progression-free survival.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marrero-Gutiérrez Junier, Bueno Ana Carolina, Martins Clarissa Silva, Silva-Júnior Rui Milton Patrício, Dos Santos Antônio Carlos, Santos Marcelo Volpon, Wildemberg Luiz Eduardo, Antunes Ximene Lima da Silva, Gadelha Monica R, Moreira Ayrton Custodio, Vêncio Ricardo Zorzetto Nicoliello, Antonini Sonir Roberto R, de Castro Margaret
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, advancements in next-generation sequencing have significantly enhanced our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (ACP).
OBJECTIVE: This study integrated methylome and transcriptome analyses in ACP samples to explore the potential interplay between DNA methylation and RNA expression signatures for diagnostic and prognostic applications in ACP patients.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated clinicopathological features, DNA methylation, and gene expression profiles in 15 patients with ACP (33% women, age range: 3-55 years, 53% diagnosed before 18 years) treated at Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo.
RESULTS: Multidimensional scaling and principal component analysis identified two distinct clusters (ACP-A: n=9, ACP-B: n=6) with consistent composition across DNA methylation and gene expression profiles. While most clinical and histopathological characteristics were similar between clusters, ACP-A exhibited a longer median progression-free survival. ACP-B showed a higher prevalence of hypomethylated probes in CGI sites, and 63% of differentially methylated positions (DMPs) located in gene body regions. Differential methylation patterns were categorized into Methyl-Set1 (hypomethylated in ACP-A and hypermethylated in ACP-B) and Methyl-Set2 (hypermethylated in ACP-A and hypomethylated in ACP-B). Clustering analyses based on the methylation levels of probes and expression levels of the stringently filtered 212- and 37-gene sets further confirmed these two distinct ACP subgroups. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted key roles in synaptic modulation, nervous system development, cell adhesion, as well as pathways linked to RAS signaling, GTPase activity, and membrane potential regulation.
CONCLUSION: Although clinical characteristics were largely comparable between the clusters, ACP-B patients exhibited shorter median progression-free survival, suggesting a more aggressive phenotype. The higher prevalence of hypomethylation in ACP-B indicates increased transcriptional activation, potentially driving tumor aggressiveness. The strong concordance between methylation and transcriptomic data in the 212- and 37-gene sets underscores their potential as a clinically relevant molecular biomarker panel. These gene sets demonstrate robustness in distinguishing ACP clusters, making it a promising tool for clinical sample classification.
OBJECTIVE: This study integrated methylome and transcriptome analyses in ACP samples to explore the potential interplay between DNA methylation and RNA expression signatures for diagnostic and prognostic applications in ACP patients.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated clinicopathological features, DNA methylation, and gene expression profiles in 15 patients with ACP (33% women, age range: 3-55 years, 53% diagnosed before 18 years) treated at Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo.
RESULTS: Multidimensional scaling and principal component analysis identified two distinct clusters (ACP-A: n=9, ACP-B: n=6) with consistent composition across DNA methylation and gene expression profiles. While most clinical and histopathological characteristics were similar between clusters, ACP-A exhibited a longer median progression-free survival. ACP-B showed a higher prevalence of hypomethylated probes in CGI sites, and 63% of differentially methylated positions (DMPs) located in gene body regions. Differential methylation patterns were categorized into Methyl-Set1 (hypomethylated in ACP-A and hypermethylated in ACP-B) and Methyl-Set2 (hypermethylated in ACP-A and hypomethylated in ACP-B). Clustering analyses based on the methylation levels of probes and expression levels of the stringently filtered 212- and 37-gene sets further confirmed these two distinct ACP subgroups. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted key roles in synaptic modulation, nervous system development, cell adhesion, as well as pathways linked to RAS signaling, GTPase activity, and membrane potential regulation.
CONCLUSION: Although clinical characteristics were largely comparable between the clusters, ACP-B patients exhibited shorter median progression-free survival, suggesting a more aggressive phenotype. The higher prevalence of hypomethylation in ACP-B indicates increased transcriptional activation, potentially driving tumor aggressiveness. The strong concordance between methylation and transcriptomic data in the 212- and 37-gene sets underscores their potential as a clinically relevant molecular biomarker panel. These gene sets demonstrate robustness in distinguishing ACP clusters, making it a promising tool for clinical sample classification.